The Difference Between “Favorite” and “Best”

The Difference Between “Favorite” and “Best”

My favorite book of all time — all genres — anything — is The Lord of the Rings.

My favorite movie of all time is The Lord of the Rings.

The Lord of the Rings is neither the best book nor the best film ever made.

And too many people see a contradiction in those three sentences.

What is “best?” It’s hard to say exactly. In art, it’s easy to see MASSIVE differences in quality. Citizen Kane is an objectively better film than Twilight and, I can admit, Lord of the Rings.

But when quality difference is subtler, distinction becomes much harder.

Who’s to say American Hustle is better than The Wolf of Wall Street?

How can you objectively state that One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest is better than To Kill A Mockingbird?

The answer of course is that you can’t, though the artistic criticism industry would love to believe that you CAN, because that would justify the existence of both their industry and their paychecks.

However, “favorite” is subjective and therefore, interestingly, much easier to define.

The Lord of the Rings is my favorite book AND movie because I can read/watch it over and over and over again. I have never grown tired of it, no matter how many times I’ve re-experienced it. I ALWAYS want to watch it again. I might do another marathon soon and watch them all in a day. I read the book once a year.

THAT’S favorite. That’s easy for me to define.

Some other people have more of a problem with this. Some people “can’t pick just one.” It can help to picture a gun to your head and a man in a mask, or it can help to imagine yourself stranded on a desert island with a genie who will grant you one wish, except he’s a crap genie because you can only wish for a single book to read for the rest of your life.

But if those scenarios don’t force people to decide, I have a trick. I say, “Okay, well tell me some of your FAVORITE books.”

In my own head, whatever book they say first is their favorite. At least subconsciously, they associate that title with the word “favorite” more than the others on their list.

It’s not a perfect system, but it works.

No one will ever be able to clearly define the “best” in any art.

But you can decide on your favorite.

 

Garrett Robinson

Over 100,000 readers have read and loved Garrett's books, like the fantasy hits Nightblade and Midrealm. He's also a film festival favorite with movies like Unsaid, and a tech guru who posts lots of helpful how-tos for writers and filmmakers over at garrettbrobinson.com.

Latest posts by Garrett Robinson (see all)

1 comments
crissymoss
crissymoss

I think if you are going for "best" you need to have a quantifiable attribute to judge it by. The best at making money. The best use of a spoon as a prop. The best at staying accurate to the original source. 


Even then there is an amount of subject-ability to the whole thing. And bias isn't just created due to personal preferences. There is an amount of investment from the person. Promoting something they love, or even promoting something they are paid to promote. That's why contests, or teaching creativity is problematic at best. It's tough to teach someone else how to use their creativity if you are bias in what you believe to be true art, whatever the form that art may take. And if there is money, or a job, or a promotion, or any number of other things on the line... well your judgment of what is "the best" just became even more unreliable.

Share This